Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:39:39 -0400
References: <BC996CCC-642A-439A-9648-C0EC23220C53@sfr.fr> <A9E30584-CA9E-4907-9552-F39001343003@cartersxrd.net> <CAE3QcF6Gih35ZPecYBhxk1J+w8vS2FWF9VkJHrOcqhg-t_vVdw@mail.gmail.com>
 
there is no item in the surroundings which is important--it is the mass, 
number, and variety of things present

the second has "less" in it and therefor losing some of the atmosphere I am 
seeing

the mess is important

i find the expressions just as engaged in the first

ric


On Nov 1, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:

> Take a look at what portion of the first's background that is still
> in the second. I don't see any more story lost by the closer framing
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)