Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:17:22 +0000
References: <0b7101ced36a$804458c0$80cd0a40$@verizon.net> <CA+=0raBD8V+5BG+_K2xiieFoPJesJnoMV1p2iEg3bMhntJT03g@mail.gmail.com>
 
Just imagine how much better  the current Leica 28mm Elmarit/Summicron and 
35mm Summicron/Summilux would be ;-)

Size / weight / cost should also come into account.....

John

> -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Lenses:
> >
> > Leica : WATE, 3E,50 ASPH Lux, 90 Elmarit M
> >
> > Nikon: 18AIS, 18-35 AFS, 24-85 G, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.4 G
> >
> > The 3E at 50 mm was very weak.  But best at 28 and 35 for this grouping.
> >
> > Frank Filippone
> >
Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......)
 In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......)