Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Herbert Kanner writes: "Could it be the increase in the effect of camera shake with the longer lens? I would have thought that the inertia from the extra weight of the lens would have compensated. Yesterday, wondering if the lens had mysteriously lost its calibration, I did a hand-held test at 12, 50, and essentially infinity feet and the pictures were needle sharp. However, to be critical, I did the test at f/2, so I got pretty high shutter speeds." - - - - - I used to shoot sports with a 135mm lens on a Leica M3 and often experienced camera motion blur even though I adhered to the rule of thumb of never using a shutter speed below 1/focal length. Finally I taped a little laser pointer to the end of the lens and stood in a fairly dark room. I aimed at a wall about 20 feet away. Even though I tried to keep the camera as steady as I could the dot of light danced around as if it was having a spastic fit. I found that it was almost impossible for me to keep the laser dot steady. When I was in the Army during the Korean War one of the non-coms in my outfit had been on the Army rifle team. He claimed that shooters did drastic things to minimize body shake, including taking drugs or a few drinks of booze before a match, holding their breath before pulling the trigger, or practicing Zenlike meditation to slow their heart beats. Some of the best could actually stop their hearts for a second or two before firing the shot. All of these might apply to taking sharp pictures at slow shutter speeds. Don't try to stop your heartbeat but a couple of stiff drinks wouldn't hurt. Larry Z