Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:31 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > A nice short blog post which sort on encapsulates what I feel about > photography, on how "rules" or "pixel peeping" stifle creativity: > > http://www.luminescentphoto.com/blog/2013/06/20/nikon-d800-myths-busted/ I see photography as a visual art. As such I consider looking at negatives, transparencies and prints, with a loupe and/or without, an important part of understanding the art of photography. I feel the same way about "pixel peeping;" simply a means to discover how equipment and software renders detail; and how that on screen rendering translates to prints. I feel the same way about studying brushstrokes, transparencies and impastos of paintings. Such studies inform our seeing; and understanding the "art." Obviously many other things about the arts also inform us; and deserve equal attention by those fully immersed the various mediums. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist