Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X Posts
From: montoid at earthlink.net (Montie)
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:03:15 -0400 (EDT)

Reading these posts with interest as they stir up some great old
memories! I was also steeped in the QC aspect of the craft for
many many years...working on joint teams (military/Kodak) running
extensive sensitometric tests to determine useful film speeds on
Special Order "SO" emulsions etc etc...that little number on the
box we all took/take for granted.

Never ceases to amaze how a craft/trade/profession that took years
to master in order to produce a useful, tactile product is now
accomplished (or can be) in just hours/minutes/seconds...speaking
technically, of course, not necessarily artistically.

Montie


>>On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:33 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> Why limit it to 'pros'? I rarely do anything to my colour shots as they 
> were all framed and exposed as desired in camera.....
> 
> john - who has never developed a C41 or E6 by hand, did a couple of E4 
> once!

definitely!

did not intend to leave anyone out
though did intend to communicate that some professionals deliver gorgeous 
.jpg files out of their cameras
just like we used to do with Kodachrome, Ektachrome, Agfachrome, Fujichrome, 
et al.

Requiring fine photographic technique with and in camera.
The enlarger was just another camera.
The darkroom just another studio.
Each process requires fine technique.
When I ran a Kodachrome and/or Ektachrome line
we had to run tests each day and throughout the day;
reading those tests with densitometers;
adjusting camera filtration to respond to the chemistry results.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Fuji X Posts)