Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Chicago Sun Times
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 09:51:55 -0500
References: <01507837-7BCF-41D5-806B-46420B120472@comcast.net> <CA+=0raA=UKszL+bp_rRmDGqT5z8hysc8+36sHiuP2=C+NQYKcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxskLTRjme+6jeTV-xMr+DSy0UC0h5Rft4Cyy0Q8qc_8WQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ3-3FvoMRPc3aiE+XwWbweJigUyVxjqJQmVM_YzU6RWyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxvapjn_Uf6dXg42G83dno277jmOOeRbHB6nuASpKcme1Q@mail.gmail.com> <6E017B37-FCD4-4985-83B6-D548F2B71884@frozenlight.eu>

On Jun 2, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Here are some reflections on this, from the perspective of someone who 
> cares about quality journalism but also recognizes that the industry is 
> changing:
> 
> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/chicago-sun-times/

yes. the times they are chang'n'
and have been changing steadily for quite some time

One could make a case for "television" shifting "demand"
for picture news media like Life and Look magazines.

Legendary, high quality news photography appearing in daily papers
like The Detroit Free Press, The Milwaukee Journal, and many more
has also declined steadily since Life and Look closed their doors in the 
'70s.
And the decline began almost a decade before the "two big ones" closed their 
doors.

One could almost say that the "market for fine still photo journalism" is us 
- photographers;

This is very different from the days when still photographs, delivered in 
newspapers and magazines,
was the only way one could get a "picture" of what was going on in the world;
unless you could afford the time and a ticket to the picture show to watch a 
couple news reels.

The very real costs and skills required to get darkroom prints and/or slides 
in your hands
also kept people going to professionals for pictures of their community and 
personal lives.

No more.

Not since your phone can deliver pictures, movies, and music.
and
Damn good ones at that (as long as you don't need a big print or show them 
in a theatre).

This basically means that a "professional" needs to deliver truly 
extraordinary "material"
to significantly out do the camera in virtually everyone's pocket.

One of the most important requirements of professional news gatherers is 
ACCESS.
Access to the events, the people, the documents, the offices, THE NEWS.
So the video shot by a bar tender at a fund raising event becomes the 
hottest news film
of a presidential election.

"The Zapruder film" foreshadowed all of this.

Gone are the:
drawing boards and layout artists
linotype machine and type setters
light tables and film strippers and color separators
moviolas and film cutters
And all within a couple decades of my life

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Chicago Sun Times)
In reply to: Message from Jon.stanton at comcast.net (Jon stanton) ([Leica] Chicago Sun Times)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Chicago Sun Times)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Chicago Sun Times)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Chicago Sun Times)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Chicago Sun Times)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Chicago Sun Times)