Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:01:19 -0400
References: <CAE3QcF6C=Tozcs7Qe95rP-B2bhUmXzj6Ag7QBc5RXW4rD-HPTA@mail.gmail.com> <CDC87893.A2E1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAE3QcF4329+tqVs+W39u4YMZLCaGeoCBxxWofouHSD6S8YjG5w@mail.gmail.com> <F44F85A9-23E9-4D12-B7C3-55ABA883C637@archiphoto.com>
;^)
ric
On May 27, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com>
wrote:
> Actually, according to Schr?dinger or rather quantum physics, it will
> contain a camera AND it won't contain a camera. But in practice only if it
> were femtometer sized and at certain energy levels. Definitely not what we
> might consider full frame. Poor ergonomics as well.
>
> Henning
In reply to:
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] REASONS why leica is so slow with M)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)