Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Mark, You highlight the dichotomy of M usefulness here. The irony is that it is a small fast camera which can be used for handheld street shooting with fast film/digital iso and often zone focussed. Of course in these conditions the optical quality is almost completely squandered. And it can be used on a tripod with optimised focus on low speed film/digital iso where the exceptional optical qualities are displayed. I, like many other M users, use mine like that most of the time. I never go out at night to take pictures, and I am too introvert to take grab shots in the street. So the only real benefit of the M over the M9 for me is focussing my R lenses using an adapter. My DMR isn't bust yet. FD On 17 May, 2013, at 21:54, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > We can use an M like that; at its lowest isos on a tripod. > Its just not so much its main thing. > Its main thing is pretty much the opposite. > Hand head at high isos getting fast breaking situations. > To those people the new M is a very big deal. > And the non higher iso's on the M9 a deal breaker.