Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You cannot argue with "The M9 is not as good as the xPro1!" with the only justification being "You get the much better package & deal with the Fujis!" plus the author has problems manually focussing RFs.... There again, more people are interested in "X is as good as a Leica" than the Leica users take of nothing else comes close ;-) john > -----Original Message----- > > I love (well, not really) how they trash the old M9 and M-E. 2 years ago, > the > M9 was the best image making machines, and now it's not worth buying?!!! > > If I don't currently have the M9, and I have ~$5000 and want the best > machine to go with Leica lens, I'd buy the M-E in a heartbeat. If I have > $8000- > $9000, then I will get the M Type 240, but that's another $3000+! > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Why on earth would someone post a blog with almost unreadable content? > > > > It is not in style to be unreadable > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com> > wrote: > > > > > I came across this interesting short blog posted today: > > > > > > > > > > > https://nicole-struppert-rwec.squarespace.com/blog/2013/4/3/back-to-ol > > d-habits-or-looking-foward > > > > > > As always it looks like 'horses for courses'. > > > > > > Gerry > > >