Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:11:48 +0000
References: <9441448.1362963991135.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>, <CAF8hL-HnGdxZZL_UFZtngqEoPsLaznLeDzkbgW0XRaT9eiVxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 
Use of R lenses on the M(240) is not much different to Leitax or other 
mounts on Canikon IMO, just the stop down aperture matters less.

john
________________________________________


It's DEAD, Jim

On the other hand, the future of the R lens, are with the M Type 240 and
its derivatives.


On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at 
earthlink.net>wrote:

> Cedric Agie wrote:
>
> >>>
>  the future of the R-systhem is uncertain.
> <<<
>
> As I understand it the R-system's future is quite certain :(
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica 75mm Summilux vs 80mm Summilux-R?)