Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Pooh!" No answer. "Come on, Pooh, wake up!" "Whassamarrer? Go 'way!" "Come on, Pooh," repeated Rabbit. "It's March. It's Springtime. It's time to stop hibernating." "Are you sure? What's happening anyway?" "Owl has completed his Quest, and ordered a camera. He's bubbling with enthusiasm and wants to tell everyone about it." Pooh decided that there was no way that Rabbit would let him sleep so, stopping only to pick up a jar of honey from the kitchen, he followed his friend out into the clearing in the Wood. Owl was there on his pontificating branch, looking Very Excited Indeed, and the other animals sat around, trying to look interested. "Let's get this clear, Owl," said Rabbit. "It's right that you should thank the LUG for its help. LUG members will likely be pleased you have found the camera you want; and those who do, or may, visit London will file away your good experience with Red Squirrel for reference. But they don't want all the details. One paragraph on what you didn't choose, one paragraph on what you did, and one paragraph on any remaining questions. That's all." "But I was planning to set the Quest in context, beginning with the development of glass-making in the Neolithic Fertile Crescent ..." "Three paragraphs. That's all." "Oh well," said Owl resignedly. "Is everyone ready?" "I suppose so," said Pooh, looking forlornly at his now-empty honey jar, "though I don't understand why you were so concerned about camera weight. We bears never have any trouble lifting heavy things ... like full honey jars." "It's a matter of the Necessary Dorsal Muscles," said Owl, "and it was the aspect of my original plan that LUG members didn't question. Some thought that my buildqualititis was extreme, and they were emphatic that APS-C sensors, or even Micro Four-Thirds sensors, were adequate for almost all amateur needs ... so they suggested several less expensive cameras, which I tried. I didn't like one of them: the Fuji X-Pro1 has a cuboid body ..." "A what?," groaned Pooh. "... and the bottom left front corner pressed into my wing when cradling the lens. Two -- the Sony RX1 and the Ricoh GXR -- couldn't take an EVF and a flash unit at the same time; I understand that few Leica users actually use flash, but I'm not ready to give it up yet. The RX1 satisfies my build-quality desires and is ultra-lightweight, but not a system camera; the Nikon D800 (which I really wanted to like) seems just as well built, and is supremely flexible, but -- if weight is a factor -- it seems at least 200 grammes too heavy. In fact, while I was at Gray Squirrel's Nikon shop in Westminster, it was the D7000 whose handling I liked most." "Why do you call him Gray Squirrel?" asked Roo. "Because his first name is Gray, and because all his customers Squirrel away their receipts, so that their spouses won't find them. Anyhow, there were three cameras whose handling I liked a lot: (1) Leica M9, (2) Nikon D7000, and (3) Olympus OM-D. Since Leica has (a) the handling I like most, (b) a build quality at least the equal of a Nikon D4, (c) a smaller size and lighter weight than my present cameras, and (d) a reputation for consistently excellent lenses ... my decision wasn't difficult. Especially as I'd found Red Squirrel (Ivor Cooper of Red Dot Cameras) to be a satisfying camera dealer. He asked a few questions to find out what I was interested in, then handed me an M9 and asked me to take a picture of the shop across the road. It was a delight to use: the split-image rangefinder worked just like the Nikon P-screen I use in my F3, and I thought the lens tab was super. It was good to be able to see outside the frame of the picture, but there seems to be no way of previewing depth of field ... I guess that's swings and roundabouts. While I was enjoying myself, Ivor was making sure that my posture and grip were suitable for a Leica, and that I'd focused accurately. Then, since I was concerned about weight, he got out a kitchen scale to compare my F3 + 50mm f/1.4 with an M9 + 50mm Summilux. Nikon 1070g, Leica 920g. Ivor already had 60 preorders for the Leica M, and so a waiting time of several months, but I was welcome to pay a deposit and join the queue. Eventually, after further experimenting, and much surfing, I did just that." "But, Owl dear," said Kanga, "if you liked the M9 so much, why have you ordered an M?" "Because, besides walkabout and portraits -- for which the M9 would be fine -- I like to take close-up pictures, mainly of flowers and fungi. And, as well as having a sensor that is three years newer, the M is the First Full-Frame MILC." "What's Milk got to do with anything?" grumbled Pooh. "Mum," said Roo. "Why is Pooh behaving like a bear with sore head to-day?" "Because he IS a bear with a sore head," said Kanga. "It's the first day after hibernation. Don't worry; he'll be fully awake soon." "MILC stands for Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera," said Owl. "It's a name the camera makers came up with, since the Internet standard name, Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens, has an unfortunate acronym. It might, or might not, be the future of single-lens photography. And I hope that it will enable a Leica M to do take close-ups" "That was a paragraph?" expostulated Eeyore. "That was a paragraph of the sort that makes Finnegans Wake so memorable!" "Talking to Ivor," continued Owl, who clearly had a sentence to two still to go, "it seems that there are differences in custom between most Leica users and most SLR users. Only about 5% of his customers buy flash units, whereas I follow the custom of using a little blip of flash to fill in the shadows. And most Leica users rarely use tripods: without mirror slap they can can hand-hold slower shutter speeds. And they like wide-aperture lenses -- the most common 50mm he sells is the Summilux -- not for swank, but because they like to blur their backgrounds." "Blur their backgrounds?" said Piglet quizzically. "Is that like your trying to cover up those hacking allegations from your youth?" "That was Network Security Research," said Owl, "but it does lead into my remaining questions. One benefit of digital photography -- which I hadn't realized -- is that you can change ISO setting from one picture to the next. In the case of the M, I've seen articles saying that you can use ISO 3200 for a shot without losing too much quality. Does this mean that one of the benefits of a wide-aperture lens -- use in low light -- doesn't matter so much anymore? The other benefit -- shallow depth of field -- continues of course. Now, I've been using a 50mm f/1.4 lens as my walkabout lens for nearly 15 years, mainly for low-light reasons, so there's a case for getting a Summilux. But might I get away with a cheaper and (whoopee!) lighter Summarit lens? Or will the style of Leica photography suck me in, and I'll lust after blurred backgrounds?"