Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Sigma DP1 Merrill
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 13:00:32 +1030
References: <CD304846.4942%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1384F096C5DC462388DDF9E9A5A55155@billHP> <CA+=0raA4mEeutLnNBaRita66a5cXO5gUTKoGAsMwjReozy1-rw@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOW8zfgXJsed+YQgkNAd-WT3E_YmsRPHW3bvYGBj_QOeEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+=0raDNH-hsi82JDS87a_TyETbssg87EiELngsAEqtJGr-yXA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Mehrdad,

> marty i have a bunch of sigma lenses, 85, 35 50 and they r all good. the
> idea about sigma qc is really old and not true any more, they are the
> biggest independent lens manufacturer in the world. at some point that had
> some issues but is way over blown.

I test lenses for a magazine.  When the newer Sigma 50/1.4 came out it
was the fourth copy of that lens that I received that did not show
severe signs of decentring.  I got bad 35 and 85 1.4 lenses first go
too.  If this is what they are sending for review, maybe it's more of
a problem with pre-production products, but I doubt it.

Marty


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Sigma DP1 Merrill)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] Sigma DP1 Merrill)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Sigma DP1 Merrill)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Sigma DP1 Merrill)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Sigma DP1 Merrill)