Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Very, but quickly resolved. Quite possible a used camera as already had it done... john > -----Original Message----- > > Sounds like good service. I have been considering the purchase of an X100 > as > the price comes down. How common is the malady that you experienced? > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > ----- Original Message ----- > > >I have been fortunate in not needing much camera service during the past > >few years. My M8 had to go back to Solms back in 2009 or 2010, and I had > >to > >have a bit of discussion with them to get them to honour the UK Passport > >warranty, but in the end they did and I got the camera back. > > > > Now my Fuji X100 developed the dreaded "sticky aperture blades" > syndrome, > > meaning that while the exposure would be determined by the aperture I > set > > on the lens, say, f5.6, actual exposure would be at f2 (but with the > > shutter speed and ISO appropriate for f5.6) thus resulting in massive > > overexposure. > > > > Fui has 2 years warranty and I bought the X100 in the summer of 2011, so > > all was good. I got on the web page of their warranty service in > > Barcelona, registered the defect online on 15th January, and downloaded > > the shipping labels. The next day a private delivery company picked up > > the > > package, free of charge of course, and during the following days I was > > able to follow the repair on Fuji's web site. Finally, it was shipped to > > me yesterday and arrived in my office this afternoon. The entire lens > > assembly was replaced and the camera was CLA'd. Everything appears to > be > > normal again. > > > > Pretty good service, I'd say. > > > > Cheers, > > Nathan > > > > Nathan Wajsman