Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted, George Well, clearly expressed, my friends! The fact: first I saw the bright green patch, and later the fine details and tiny structures. The matter: when travel I usually just take 3 lenses with me: 21-35, 35-70 and 70-210, the one used is in this case. In other circumstances, the Apo-Macro 100 would have been my choice, for sure. Even so, I still think the first version has the merit to site the item in its context, without minimize the appealing center of the image... Next time, I'll take more lenses :) Thanks a lot for your opinion!. Cheers, Marc _______________________________________________ Mosses, lichens and eucalyptus cropped. http://tinyurl.com/bcu8cnb Any opini?n about? Cheers, _______________________________________________ Hi Marc, I like this tighter version much better. However? My gut feeling is because it is a lichen or moss to get thr real visial impact maybe it requires a "macro?" kind of image. There seems lots of "tiny elements" that wouuld increase the impact of the image if a macro type photo. I still think that's how your "vision was being affected" by all the tiny bits. But then it's your photo and how you saw and felt it through the the camera? cheers, ted _______________________________________________ I do prefer the tighter view a lot Regards, George Lottermoser