Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]*Scott Gregory* wrote: *Tue Jan 22 15:15:31 PST 2013* I certainly agree. And I guess I was lucky with the copy I purchased. Scott ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I was lucky to get a good copy of this lens too Scott. I also know severalother people, both personally and from their comments on the GetDPI forum, who are satisfied with the performance of this lens. All things considered, I'm very happy with my 24-120 f4G VR lens. The IQ (for the subjects I shoot) is very good and I love the versatility of this lens. Both of these images were taken with my copy of this lens on my D700. Please view large: http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bensonga/DSC_1163+Portage+Glacier+XXXL.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bensonga/DSC_1172+Portage+Glacier+XXXL.jpg.html Lest anyone think...it may be ok on a 12 megapixel D700, but it will never work on a 36 megapixel D800. Well, I have a good friend who is shooting exclusively with a D800E and finds his copy of the 24-120 f4G VR lens more than acceptable. I've seen his images and I would certainly agree. Of course, as we know.....it's unfortunate that not every copy of this lens may be up to those standards. Gary Benson Eagle River, Alaska