Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:19:30 +0000
References: <CAJ4y7gyFZh5BW+zDEBik4ebbp7deipnnpz4TwyXtELdmigXWRQ@mail.gmail.com> <CD1F6115.3CA9%mark@rabinergroup.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9A32753DC@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAF8hL-Gm7DZKWerzE871jHQEkSD9rEjMktXvkV_zbV4S7Q=Rvw@mail.gmail.com>
I have read that often over the last couple of decades, but personally I
find 28 too wide to be of use unless in -very- crowded situations, which I
avoid due to claustrophobia.. I bought one, but it pretty well never gets
used. Should sell it I suppose...
I find the 50 most useful, and I like the 75-90 range best (by a long way)
FD
On 19 Jan, 2013, at 02:09, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
wrote:
> For many people, 28mm has been the standard wide for awhile. Just a tad
> more than the 35mm, but more useful on the street, without the "immersive"
> of 24 or 21.
>
>
Replies:
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)
In reply to:
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)