Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 21:38:08 -0800
References: <20121201025416.DUKW5450.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo209>

No.  When the market was early, and Zeiss was all over cameras, there was
the Contax 1 and 2 and 3 and then there was the Leica ( whatever ) model.
Zeiss was king.  Leica the upstart.  As the Good Book says, in the
beginning, it was Contax and Leica.  Contax was more elegant, more lenses,
more you name it.  Leica was cheaper by a lot.  People who could not afford
the Contax, bought Leicas.  So why did Leica become supreme over the Contax?

Because the Contax shutters required constant tweaking, constant replacement
of the shutter cords, and basically were not reliable.

Deja vue? 

Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net


Haven't Leicas always been pricey? 




Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)
In reply to: Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)