Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So, how many images have you made with the X100 since you know so much about it? Looking in my LR catalog, I see 1497 X100 images. Many of them are in poor light, and I would put them against an M9 any time. I am going to Paris for a couple of days on Tuesday, and because I need to travel ultra-light, I am taking just the X100. I am sacrificing some versatility wrt. focal length by doing so, but I am NOT sacrificing any image quality. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On Nov 25, 2012, at 6:07 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > The 800 dollar camera is in sync with the fact that its sensor is half the > size of the RX1. > This is the Leica list and we're talking about a high quality camera. > Its not a smaller then necessary format camera selling for the price of a > Leica lens shade. > The Rollei 35 and Olympus XA really could give your SLR quality. > If they were half frame cameras they could not. > The Fuji is a half frame in effect digital camera. > "quality" is not why your buying the camera unless your comparing it > against > junk point and shoots. > And my apologies to those who bought the camera thinking you were buying a > piece of top pro gear. But it would not take a genius to figure out a full > frame compact was in the wings. And yes they cost real money. > > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >