Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Petroglyphs near Bishop stolen
From: abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:22:39 -0800
References: <E833C3C6-3C7F-4FC3-997E-35CFE64EE6B9@mac.com> <CAF8hL-E2rbSE=5T2o5LuADeVpeEFXXbGXbFJkm5tH5hqFu39zw@mail.gmail.com> <42187E72-C3C3-4E91-A267-8D36BF5BD527@mac.com> <004201cdc781$b4273770$1c75a650$@cox.net>

I'm not sure I'd go for 1 in 4 unless the definition for psychopath (or 
sociopath) is widened profoundly or the sampling is amongst Wall Street 
types in which case I think the number might be 1:1.2 or something. <grin>

Do you recall the reference? I'm curious about the citation and would like 
to read it.

There's lots of money out there and people want something for that special 
exhibit in their trophy guest house in their third home.

Adam

On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:

> Some of my better petroglyph images are from the park in the suburbs of
> Albuquerque.  I've wondered how long it would be there.  I've heard for a
> long time that the locations of many of the Anasazi ruins are secret, since
> some of the artifacts are extremely valuable.  If I recall correctly, there
> was a lot of vandalism in the Utah slot canyons also.  I read a book the
> other day that suggests that approximately one in four persons is a
> psychopath  -- might be true.
> 
> Ken 



Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Petroglyphs near Bishop stolen)
In reply to: Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Petroglyphs near Bishop stolen)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Petroglyphs near Bishop stolen)
Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Petroglyphs near Bishop stolen)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Petroglyphs near Bishop stolen)