Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Geez, I had forgot all about those. Amazing what you can re-learn on the LUG. Now I've just got to figure out how to enlarge them so I can read their names. ==On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: > No, I like the choices on the left and used one of the dynamic or structure > ones - LR is updating itself now and I can't check. LR 4.2 is available > for upgrading. > I usually add a little grain, too. > > Tina > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> > wrote: > > > Tina, > > > > Did you use one of the film emulations in using SFP2 to convert the M9 > > image? > > > > Robert > > > > On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:43 AM, robert.rose at mac.com wrote: > > > > > > > > They both look like B&W. Continuing our last discussion (:-) the M9 > > image looks like it was shot with T-Max 100 and the MM looks like Tri-X. > > > > > > I never liked T-Max. > > > > > > Bob > > > > > > From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> > > > Subject: [Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4 > > > Date: October 3, 2012 4:18:56 AM PDT > > > To: MUGers at yahoogroups.com, lug <lug at leica-users.org>, paw < > > paw at micapeak.com>, seephoto <seephoto at micapeak.com>, Olympus Camera > > Discussion <olympus at thomasclausen.net> > > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > > > > > > > > PESO: > > > > > > Several asked to see the M9 photo converted to B&W to compare with the > MM > > > one. > > > > > > http://www.pbase.com/image/146447879 > > > > > > Using exactly the same settings in Silver Efex Pro that I used for the > MM > > > one. > > > > > > . . . . > > > > > > Opinions greatly appreciated. > > > > > > Tina > > > > > > -- > > > Tina Manley, ASMP > > > www.tinamanley.com > > > >