Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/10/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4
From: rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CA+yJO1BHosn7aBeqMjGan0FNnExKHG-3Md3N65GP2pPPpnRu+A@mail.gmail.com> <9C06DEC0-BF88-44B9-BA72-22939CBD8E5C@mac.com> <B5E000B2-EF0C-4213-9759-0093DDA723A3@mcmaster.co.nz> <CA+yJO1CwW6Qk+Cen5PJZqbRv6CmwCVxip4_CAzqekksr0J4guw@mail.gmail.com> <042d01cda173$8f09d670$ad1d8350$@earthlink.net>
It looks to me as though I could probably tweak either frame to look like
the other, which in? a digital world means "too close to call."
I wouldn't complain at all if someone handed me either one.? ;>)
?
R. Clayton McKee
PhotoJournalist
from somewhere just south of somewhere else...
In reply to:
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from scottgregory at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)