Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 17:07:30 +1200
References: <031701cd3a93$b81db2d0$28591870$@earthlink.net> <CAJ3Pgh7wrutznWeGyyKe077vycU-8tmcYPKeXUUNu4QMWQvLMQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E971F25E86@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAJ3Pgh6WG7rhtcgdnpEYLj8sPi8GwGmZDoK=PA40YDOJSZPMkA@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E971F2874D@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAH1UNJ23Kq2YgqwV_7esonmnuAi51i32OHtBco0X_oOpvOk-ew@mail.gmail.com>
Or leading up to the price of a re-calculated Summilux well into five
figures....
john
-----Original Message-----
John,
IMHO, you got it all wrong - they will actually have more demand at full
price than at half price - that is the way the luxury market operates. (-:
Half price is generally only used for getting rid of unwanted stock, i.e.
spring cleaning!
Cheers
Jayanand
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 8:16 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
wrote:
> I doubt they could keep up with demand at half the price!
>
> john
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 50AA: What does it mean for film users?)