Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina Manley SHOWED: Subject: [Leica] IMG: Fruit Vendor > One from 1977 that I developed myself in Iran. It had a big orange > chemical stain on the top that is still slightly visible. I tried > desaturating and cloning what I could. It's much better than it was. Any > suggestions for getting rid of it completely? > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/143103410 > > Worth working with or not? Hi Tina, If you hadn't said anything about "a stain?" I doubt anyone would've noticed it. But then every screen is different. ERGO? the stain maybe seen on some screens more so than another. Or not even seen at all. Bottom line? If it is so slight and you feel you've taken it out as much as possible without making the changes obvious? Don't say anything about it. It's never use a "negative thought" triggering the observer to have negative thoughts, when if they knew not of your concerns. They'd have become raving accolades about how wonderful the photo is! :-) Add a word of negativism and that's what the viewer begins to look for! And your beautiful photo becomes a "second rate image!" Always be positive, never any negative vibes at all! Heck if you feel any are there? Keep quiet and let the viewer find it on their own. Then if they should bring it up? Explain it as delicately as possible, but still trying to use positive wording as much as you can! Well that is unless you know in your heart it is truly a piece of crap and you should've dumped it in file 13 in the first place! ;-) But you let your "shooting image emotions" over ride your photographic common sense. Then threw away 2 hours fiddling the print to make something out if it, when in-reality it wasn't worth it in the first place........ :-( HOWEVER? WE HAVE ALL DONE THAT ALLOWING EMOTIONS OF SHOOTING THE MOMENT TAKE OVER OUR GUT FEELING COMMON SENSE!" Then blown hours trying to make something out of what was a kind of sows ear. Then shed a tear and dumped it. :-( However? if someone brings up the subject? Then explain and ask for assistance as you did. But this photo itself is far from being a sow's ear with all the subjects and action going on it's strong action content holds the eyes attention without wandering all over the sky area "where maybe??" A stain or slight off colour might be noticed? So endth the lesson for today! ;-) cheers, Dr. ted :-)