Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/04/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Vasillia, 17
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:28:51 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1Ak-1vnq=0D1qKkz3H+5gtAhMS5STcxnDM+7vAXG_3uBg@mail.gmail.com> <6952F5DF-DACD-4909-8E51-CF842F767ABC@mac.com> <5826C31B-2349-4389-A3C6-D4E1F336E644@cox.net> <CAMvGeU_1-ScMj3kV378r3AtjdvgBs3tOKb+2KbSJdP0XHe6kYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+yJO1B7pAVYMrMXvTyzzbgZ2g7aGaHYakZCAXNT6chXOoG=Dg@mail.gmail.com>
On Apr 28, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> I tried that first but bringing the shadows out also brought out lots of
> noise that I couldn't tame without it looking plastic and washed out - like
> the other photos I've posted lately that drew so much criticism!!
What we're not discussing about these scans:
What do you see in those shadows with a loupe on the transparency?
If you see detail in those shadows
and it turns to noise in the scan
then the scan is underexposed
(at least for those shadows).
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Vasillia, 17)
In reply to:
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Vasillia, 17)
Message from bjq1 at mac.com (Barney Quinn) ([Leica] IMG: Vasillia, 17)
Message from stasys1 at cox.net (Stasys Petravicius) ([Leica] IMG: Vasillia, 17)
Message from photobynelsch at gmail.com (Bill Nelsch) ([Leica] IMG: Vasillia, 17)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Vasillia, 17)