Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon
From: tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray)
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:07:48 -0400
References: <CAF8hL-FHOzYfurv9pp1a3+u1f3_39HGYsohp-=vvN=HOdG+Z9w@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOXQYh21UQ5kbtt+h_-9F=XFsOV-p7--mfH2c4UMaoHC1g@mail.gmail.com> <20120406141008.GW69877@selenium.125px.com> <20120406103530.773412f7@linux-pfy5.site> <C1E2BDC6-2441-4409-9F88-0460F847AB89@btinternet.com>
 
On Apr 06, 2012 at 05:06 PM +0100, Frank Dernie wrote:
>There is also no such thing as full retrofocus, merely various degrees. 
>None of the Leica M lenses are anything like as extreme as is necessary 
>for a reflex camera. 

Thanks - That was the point I was trying to make.  And which Zeiss makes 
in the linked pdf.
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)