Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Apr 02, 2012 at 01:42 AM +0930, Marty Deveney wrote: >On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> wrote: >> What always confuses me is that T-MAX 100 wasn't mentioned. Also a good >> film. > >I don't mention it because it also has (to me) a somewhat odd spectral >response: Understood. The T-Max films do have a different spectral sensitivity, but in my experience, most films differ in this respect. Actually, Techpan had extended red response, so if that's important to the original poster, I'm not sure any of these is a good match. I wasn't really only pointing the finger at you. More of a statement about these kinds of discussions online. T-Max 100 always seems to be left out. I saw a comparison between these four films on rangefinderforum a couple months ago. Unfortunately, the scans are no longer on line. The films weren't identified at first and people guessed which picture was which film. It was interesting to see what people guessed - they placed their favorite films with the pictures they liked the most. One of the scans looked noticeably worse than the others (could have been the development, the film, or the scanning) and that was the one that several people said was T-Max. The one that many people liked the most was the actual T-Max shot though most people thought it was something else. Once the results were revealed, several people were shocked to find out how grainy the PanF+ actually was. Of course, it was more of a test of those four films, developed in the manner they were developed, and scanned the way they were scanned. I'm sure the one film that looked bad could have looked much better had it been developed differently. What I thought was interesting is that the test seemed to highlight a bias against T-Max films by many. Obviously, if you don't like T-Max 100, you are free to not like it. All of these four films are probably different enough from Techpan in various ways that I'd rather just mention all four and try not to let my biases enter in.