Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:29:24 -0500
References: <CB925A39.1C04F%mark@rabinergroup.com>

On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> I'd recommend the LUG gallery.

Would you recommend the LUG gallery for:
1) exporting client catalogs directly out of Lightroom
2) locking images to prevent downloading
3) allowing clients to directly order prints and/or images for reproduction
4) handling the printing, billing and then sending you a check for the order
5) complete customization of the look of the galleries (globally and/or 
gallery specifically)
6) custom print and license pricing (globally and/or by gallery)
[the list does go on]

The LUG gallery is a wonderful service provided by Brian. Kudos! Brian

It is a completely different thing, in both form and function, than services 
like SmugMug.
It's akin to comparing a point and shoot to a FF professional camera.

> Also there are things dancing all around your pictures.

There's nothing "dancing around" my photographs on smugmug.
<http://george-lottermoser.smugmug.com/>

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LUG users happy W SmugMug?)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)