Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Probably a silly question....
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:05:29 +1300
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E947489249@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <CB7DE966.1B490%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
Google "35mm Summilux FLE" gets me 466,000 hits with Mr Rockwell at the
top....

john

-----Original Message-----

Welli'd replied that the term FLE Is not used on the box but I'm also going
to say its not used very often at all to describe the lens by people on
chatgroups NOT on the box. Easy enough to check just search engines for 35mm
Summilux FLE and see how many hits you get.

> 
> Shorthand for people to know the difference in model, would you rather I
said
> that a 11663 was available?
> 
> john
> ________________________________________
> 
> 
> FLE is Zeiss.
> You'll not find it on a Leica box nor on a lens.
> Just think of it as "Fleiss".
> 
>
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)
Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)
 In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)