Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Mar 04, 2012 at 04:04 AM -0800, Richard Man wrote: >Yes, but my question is, how come the SWC Biogon doesn't seem to have the >distortion of circles becoming oblong on the edges, or am I incorrect in >saying that? You are incorrect in saying that. What you are referring to is often called perspective distortion, and any lens that has a rectangular projection has it. What the SWC doesn't have is barrel, pincushion, wave, mustache, or other types of distortion that makes straight lines not straight. Personally I think the SWC downplays perspective distortion a bit (relative to 35mm lenses) because of its square format. The diagonal field of view (FOV) is 91 degrees, similar to the diagonal FOV of 21mm on a 35mm camera. But the horizontal/vertical FOV is only 72 degrees, which is slightly less than the horizontal FOV of a 24mm lens for 35mm format. Lastly, it's vertical FOV is similar to a 15-16mm lens's vertical FOV on 35mm. So in some senses (diagonally), it's as wide as a 21mm lens, in other senses (horizontally), it's narrower, and vertically, it's a good deal wider. Compared to a 35mm lens, it's much more balanced in the FOV it provides in different directions on the basis of it being a square format. When I had an SWC, I wasn't putting peoples heads in the corners of the frame; if they were near the edge, they were much more likely near the top or the side, so you get a bit less perspective distortion there.