Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] an interesting comparison of S2
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:53:42 -0600
References: <27E5930E-9417-45C8-9ECD-C44601D90166@mac.com> <1700130776.3812751330644386791.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <CAF8hL-GU3teAqaFTrB_9UJmzgiBVtV7Xu3SavpCZ0pdgMJ1M+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-HQHmXR9C=WcqbqAUd2bMgYXhBb-dZTMgjNuhoLsEN8mw@mail.gmail.com> <62CA055E-2CDB-4429-AAA7-41026AD96BAC@mac.com> <CAF8hL-FH_WKso8POGNTksOhan=ee3Gz7Dbd5KmyCwbTYMMhZRQ@mail.gmail.com>
And then there's 4) the actual business administration.
It really requires at least a small team to pull it off.
When it was "actually" working for me
I had a part time agent, an office/bookkeeper, and two production assistants
who could function in the studio, darkroom and at the drawing board; as well
as two galleries that I could depend on for a show every couple years, and
who'd keep a few prints in the bins.
a note off the iPad, George
On Mar 1, 2012, at 6:44 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
wrote:
> I think a) and b) may actually take more time...
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)