Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] an interesting comparison of S2
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:17:14 -0600
References: <380-22012341215718126@M2W108.mail2web.com>
 
On Mar 1, 2012, at 3:57 PM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net wrote:

> ain't that the truth.
> 
> for a good laugh we could share our "schemes"
> probably "off list" to avoid embarrassment
> <<<
> 
> Like "by selling photographs"?  That ought to be good for a few guffaws or
> a mouthful of coffee splattered on a screen somewhere.

Well yah - selling photographs "of birds" - and such - ain't gonna do "it"

gotta start shooting "what 'they're' buying"

get yer butt to those California hot spots
and I don't mean the wilderness and refuges
and start stalking "STARS"
(not herons and cranes)

considered porn?

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] an interesting comparison of S2)