Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] [LRflex] thoughts ?
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:50:21 +0100
References: <408CF038-05D4-4FC0-B9CE-5370D40EF08C@gmail.com>

Go for colour but please dim vibrance by two clicks and also decrease  
saturation - the subject is too serious for fancy colours on this one  
Steve
The BW is telling another - false - story IMHO; too luminous, the eye  
is nearly lit with interest, hope or something - forget about it - the  
soul of this one picture is in the colour version.
I'd go for a mighty crop too - the black corner, right, and the lady  
and orange thing in the distance don't help the photo. Crop vertical  
and lose most of his right hand too.

This guy should be entitled to hate us all, my feeling tonight.

Amiti?s
Philippe



Le 13 f?vr. 12 ? 17:40, Steve Barbour a ?crit :

> first this
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW2012/struggling.jpg.html
>
>
>
> now this
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW2012/color.jpg.html
>
>
>
> Leica M9  Noctilux
>
>
> I will not comment as to my own thoughts here...
>
>
> I do ask please your input as to which of the two you find most  
> effective, which you prefer (that may be different) and why that is ?
>
> (Sorry Ted, but this may be an exceptional case...)
>
>
>
> very much appreciated,
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
NO ARCHIVE


Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] [LRflex] thoughts ?)
In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] thoughts ?)