Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] leica m10
From: zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams)
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:35:01 -0600
References: <CA+=0raD-LHEE+rZZG+UEOBCEV=Hk4e35PRgbu3qofrJqfyG9Gg@mail.gmail.com> <1328640641.46586.YahooMailNeo@web87301.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <20120207152951.16de1ff2@linux-pfy5.site> <3B465FC2-B6D3-48B9-A40A-AC1FBAD034C7@frozenlight.eu> <20120207160931.7bd1dc86@linux-pfy5.site> <F906F6B3-443D-4CC6-AC1A-EA299FA0C07E@gmail.com> <CA+=0raAZJD82C8k=um93e5q=ZV3qcpr0G8=G9=m0x7V3mHN8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
I don't think Leica needs to compete with those cameras at all with
the M system. A smaller sensor sized body maybe yes.
Chris Williams
www.zoeicaimages.net
www.rebirthworkshops.com
504-231-6261
On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:33 PM, mehrdad wrote:
> at the same time, leica needs to compete with the new fuji sony or the
> canon nikon stuff regardless of the price. they need to attract new
> customers (though i don't know why, everything is always sold out)
> so some
> of these features need to show up in the new leica
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Leowesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Honestly I would just change two things: I would have a thumb cock
>> shutter like the RD1 and a little better high iso quality.
>>
>>
>> Leo Wesson
>> www.leowesson.com
>>>
In reply to:
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leowesson) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica m10)