Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]perhaps. but at least now we have a chance at a transparent do-over. better than nothing. the first time around was so beyond the pale it outraged even us indians. bharani Message: 31 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:17:09 -0500 From: Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Leica] Photographic Freedom To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Message-ID: <CAFuU78fgC3vKaL60Rnd2GRqjxhrQbEGK7cUMZ77_tbTon-hqQw at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm not sure if I understand the issue or its resolution entirely, but it sounds like there'll be a second go-round. Isn't there a good chance cronyism and behind the scenes maneuvering will redetermine the 'new' outcome? On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote: > As an overall sort of reaction to this thread, here is an example, from > yesterday, on what a combination of committed citizens, a legally enshrined > Right to Information process and Public Interest Litigation, together with > an independent Higher Judiciary can achieve against the corrupt political > elite, even in India: > > http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2853159.ece > > The reactions from multinationals and their shills is astonishing - to they > effect they actually PREFER crony capitalism to the rule of law. I never > expected them to react publicly to this effect. (-: > > Cheers > Jayanand >