Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Thoughts on drum scanning
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:21:06 -0600
References: <CB509173.19D5C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <4F2B32B5.6060409@cox.net> <CABmfTOUMHbD0e_G3t7t81n7rRUMtN2uCf1s=bcp99MsTU8KN6A@mail.gmail.com>
 
On Feb 2, 2012, at 7:13 PM, Marty Deveney wrote:

> The main cost factor with a drum scan is time.  A 900MB scan might tie
> up the scanner for half a day.

I find it quite amazing that these current drum scan prices
appear to be 50% - 75% the cost they were back in the day (circa 85 - 92)
when I was purchasing the service on a regular basis.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Thoughts on drum scanning)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Thoughts on drum scanning)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Thoughts on drum scanning)