Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Help with Nocti
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:06:56 -0800
References: <CAAsXt4PtZpLJaH2zgX0F0O6QBa2x747d8EvTa+hQWvLvQR1ocA@mail.gmail.com> <1457141557.10806911327275290110.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <CAAsXt4PO9NG5sGTtGfd7T9XDaZnLG50xUD4kX3+1P5tDb_SNtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxtPz+O4otEgY2+GavhGyonuwsewuMF1JPAepO9iswbapg@mail.gmail.com>
 
The advantage of having Leica do the coding, is that for a single fee, ( I
was quoted $225 for a 75 Summilux)  they change the mount and then accurize
the lens for the M8/9.

If you will, the coding is secondary to the focus checking and accuracy.....

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


The M9 can manually set for that lens without coding. If I still used a
Noctilux, I think I would get it coded, since the M9 uses code for more than
data reporting.
> > Sounds like a good buy.  Not sure I would bother with the coding, 
> > but
> that
> > is my personal opinion.  My only coded lenses are my 21 Asph and 28
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)