Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:47:05 -0600
References: <CAF8hL-EYfK2dNmLeEBZkof1kHa1rFt-756=Osfq3gwOx+24H=w@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E93661791A@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAF8hL-Fpr3R-fyb6zE9fC5cVVUD+uxLZn6BMqaZr9c6wuB6QMA@mail.gmail.com> <2D9ED001-7160-4CD3-88E1-D7D428DA9F25@mac.com> <op.v7l71txnqcd5uq@colinb.office.supranet.net> <A1147AAE-4A9C-4F5C-B6EB-D2B5D1238DDF@comcast.net>
On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Richard Taylor wrote:
> All of a sudden we're getting a whole bunch of RF-like large sensor
> cameras that are opening all kinds of doors for those of us who still have
> a bunch of Leica lenses sitting in a drawer and just refuse to spend $7K
> on an M9 body.
Except they're not at all RF-like.
(except in the physical size of the camera)
When speaking of RF's we're talking about a viewing/focusing system;
which none of the cameras under discussion have.
And it remains to be seen whether any of these other view systems
will work in any way close to the precise, quick focusing
of a well calibrated RF with manual focus lenses.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
In reply to:
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from colin at colinbaker.org (Colin Baker) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)