Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] My artist's statement
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:29:34 -0600
References: <501568008.830497.1325651679987.JavaMail.root@mail12.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <84C9DBD9-6464-4471-B644-D216DAF97C8B@embarqmail.com> <E7AC8FD88D2D4F7C814EF06B4D31FCB5@billHP>

On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:

> Unlikely.
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Ric Carter

> can it exclude artsy fartsy mumbo jumbo and still pass for fine art? ;^)

I do understand the humor here?

though it seems at the expense of a serious question by Chris
who's certainly paid his dues as a serious photographer;
working hard at his craft, his art and his marketing.

There's certainly much to editorialize about within the world of "Art"
which includes artists, dealers, galleries, critics, museums, publishers, 
buyers and critics.

Yet in this particular case I see only
solid, honest discipline producing remarkable photographs
with a powerful, unique style,
compelling text,
presented totally without pretense.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] My artist's statement)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] My artist's statement)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] My artist's statement)