Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:54:56 -0700
References: <CACkqTDQ6YDBtnJNiOmSt3P5K_HtFtgEfPLAo37nGbCzTBRbNgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD7872D.1641C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CACkqTDS-StR4MtvwOrMPOnPynz2OxN6Sfr8rrZP0+1ESXkJ9-A@mail.gmail.com> <20111103001943.3ed95909@linux-pfy5.site> <041401cc99e1$c709eeb0$551dcc10$@earthlink.net>

Hey folks I took a break to rest my eye and I found all this stuff! :-( 
Amazing, you guys are still playing with all this non-essential stuff 
instead of out taking the wonderful photographs you do?

Like really????? Does 1.4 compared to 1.8 make the absolute major difference 
between an ICONIC PHOTO and "Hey not a bad shot?"

Get yer buns out there and just shoot great photo moments and twiddle all 
this techie meaningless stuff ! Oh I suppose there are moments of greatness 
when it does? But really?

See you all sometime in the future! The anecdotes and stories are coming 
along just fine for the new book. I thought I might drop the odd one on the 
screen as a sort of teaser? ;-)

We shall see? ;-)

Now get out and shoot! You are all wonderful photographers to be knocking 
yourselves out with this diddly 1.4 stuff!:-)
cheers,
Dr. ted :-)



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)
In reply to: Message from quantran101 at gmail.com (Quan Tran) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)
Message from quantran101 at gmail.com (Quan Tran) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)