Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:39:09 -0400
References: <63C28AFB-46A8-4F3A-ABD1-D58A638C0660@mac.com> <CAA94ADD.14F77%mark@rabinergroup.com> <20110928225934.3c82e5ff@linux-pfy5.site> <CAF8hL-FOYdkcbmTQF8ttsvSF0Jks_YEnXCSaE5Xv4xLKOytksw@mail.gmail.com> <fec4b1a1da2846e35e009feb689c407e@mail.gmail.com> <20110928232041.4432851b@linux-pfy5.site> <1b8711de8f789e28b5002bdae4d54048@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:22:01 -0400
Jim Shulman <jshulman at judgecrater.com> wrote:
> That is, if GEH owns the copyright to the images, rather than just the
> artifacts themselves.
that smells like Getty.
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)