Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:45 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > My first instinct was "yet another reason to stay away from LA, a place > where I cannot think of any reason to visit" (yes, I have been there). But > after reading the entire article, I am beginning to think, what is the big > deal? It sounds very much like the encounter was polite, the cop asked to > see the photographer's drivers license, ran a quick check and then left > the guy alone to continue taking pictures. I sit back with a feeling that > a non-incident is being blown up out of proportions here. I have experienced a number of these "non-incidents" with one running 40 minutes before the "polite officer" allowed me exercise my "right" to photograph in the world. It is beyond frustrating. There is absolutely no logical reason for the police to intervene in the practice of photography by either professionals or amateurs. Google maps will provide more useful information to someone intending mayhem. And if some nut-job needs a different view for their dire plan they'll grab it with a phone or palm held p&s. George