Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:19:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00) > From: Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000 long reply IMGs > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Howard Cummer wrote: > >> FUD?? > > Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt. A single photo of dusty conditions isn't > the same as a statistically-significant sample comparing failure > rates of the equipment in question, but it's more effective at > convincing people. FUD is a favorite tool of many political > strategists. > > Doug Herr Hi Doug, My acronym knowledge has increased today, thank you. I don't agree with the assumption underlying your comment that I was trying to "frighten" Alastair with a "Karl Rove" moment. :-) Alastair is a LUG friend whom I have met and I admire his photography with the DMR, as I admire your work, but I didn't see the DMR surviving the dusty conditions I experienced in India and expect in Africa. I could be wrong but if I was not where would that leave Alastair? My picture described the environment. I understand about statistically significant samples (economist here with multiple degrees) but don't see how Alastair would be helped if his DMR (a sample of one) was ruined along the way and he had no back up to complete the safari. I'm pleased that he made his decisions and look forward to seeing the results which will be, I'm sure, impressive, (No pressure Alastair!!). Howard