Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digital vs film cost
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:26:02 -0500
References: <19575041.1311023894480.JavaMail.root@mswamui-bichon.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CAF8hL-GD7e=G8cGAYKYKTrN7vBv55DfTs6Y3s2DDPoBFUjM4Vw@mail.gmail.com> <0BB100C9-52EA-40DB-9C68-F93D4123D835@mac.com> <CA+yJO1AYV-R_h7AC71hhNgh9QRVLDd2xz3HSHSYKAxhVBVDbSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> You have to be better than the prosumers but that's not often an issue
> since
> "good enough" and "cheap" trump "best quality" most of the time.
Something unique, special, unavailable anywhere else
1 (no easy task)
and
somebody
somewhere
actually has to see what you've created
2 (no easy task)
and
actually wants to pay a reasonable fee for "it" or "its use."
3 (no easy task)
that's 3 difficult tasks
which absolutely nothing to do with
"digital vs. film cos"
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)
In reply to:
Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)