Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAD 7/7/2011: camera test
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 23:58:58 -0700
References: <68DAE56B-7FA6-490D-9755-F48F4C09E2FE@frozenlight.eu>

I'll play devil's advocate here: if you sell you M8.2, your X100, and your
(GF1?), you are probably only a thousand or two shy of a good condition used
M9 (~$6000-$6400?)

Obviously your choice, but that's the rationale I used way back then and I
think I made the right decision.

But the X100 does look pretty good....

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
frozenlight.eu>wrote:

> My Fuji X100 arrived yesterday afternoon. Now, I could put the camera on a
> tripod and shoot a newspaper on a wall or some such. Or I could point the
> camera at my co-workers. No prizes for guessing what I chose:
>
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/4253606_netUM#1373537886_sC4HCvj-O-LB
>
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/4253606_netUM#1373537798_2mbcLJj-O-LB
>
> The first picture is cropped for composition, the second one is uncropped.
>
>

-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAD 7/7/2011: camera test)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAD 7/7/2011: camera test)