Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Why, it was a 50mm (correct), f1.4 shot at ~f2.4. There is no connection between the lens and body about what aperture is in use. As I have said before, a "rather complete set of M glass" is worth rather more than an M9 body so deserves to be used.... john -----Original Message----- Well in the year 2525 Leica will figure out how to get its inform into the metadata accurately. I hope its before than that I can swing one. A body that is. I have a rather complete set of M glass. Mark William Rabiner > From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 19:55:49 +1200 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH > > Nope, a 50mm Summilux asph ;-) > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > I also on occasion use Leica glass older than myself. > > The first image of yours I clicked on seemed to have been shot with a 50mm > f/2.4. > A Leica Summarit 50mm f/2.5 it would seem? But don't know for sure. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Chiaroscuro/Misc/Juliet2.jpg.html > > >> From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 19:34:04 +1200 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH >> >> I use my M9 with lenses older than myself...... >> >> john >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Its a brand new M9 the guy just got and now he's putting a 1980 >> Elmarit 21 on it. >> >>