Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:38:11 -0400
References: <BLU0-SMTP83B191AFFD2D90C0C7D4538C510@phx.gbl> <BANLkTi=EoiqzfkDUCFVrZ_isTkB4uQ3OrQ@mail.gmail.com> <A2AFBB2B-3DE8-414A-BF9A-D0EC7FA25720@bex.net> <BLU0-SMTP3314F39F1B89E346B496308C510@phx.gbl> <BANLkTik7axKoWyv6fJ__TeDDfCN7N-Mhtw@mail.gmail.com>
Ah, yes, "designed in Midland" = "designed by W.Mandler"
Vick
On 6/21/2011 8:56 AM, Marty Deveney wrote:
> Designed by Dr Walter Mandler: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Mandler
>
> Marty
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Vick Ko<vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> Ver 1 = Wetzlar design, Midland production, from 1972. Has the small
>> front
>> filter ring.
>>
>> Mandler version = Ver II, designed in Midland, made in Wetzlar, from1977.
>> Built in shade.
>>
>> Vick
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/21/2011 8:17 AM, Howard Ritter wrote:
>>> What is the Mandler version, why is it so named, and how can I tell
>>> whether mine is one?
>>>
>>> ?howard
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)