[Leica] Another R option (now M9)

Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another R option (now M9)
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:19:53 -0700
References: <BANLkTi=AN3Voe46p_kWSW5h5eh9h8rAnEg@mail.gmail.com> <6B0082E6-FDE6-4DCB-AFCF-C6B3504A5730@btinternet.com> <006f01cc2a97$9d7bb420$d8731c60$@earthlink.net> <BANLkTi=rwyXw=j0B8ta4j7KKPJKdm_VWww@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinwJa0sFZA2s4JGGGQJJX2Za=Racw@mail.gmail.com>

It was a stupid strategy with the M9.  Why would anyone rich enough to
afford a $7K body buy the cheapest ( and therefore least good) lens?

Ridiculous.

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


Because Leica Camera's customers have bought more than twice as many
Summiluxes as Summarits when given the choice.

In reply to: Message from wanderjan at gmail.com (Jan Decher) ([Leica] Another R option (now M9))
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Another R option (now M9))
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Another R option (now M9))
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Another R option (now M9))
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Another R option (now M9))