Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Foothill Park
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:57:58 -0500
References: <747098.9554.qm@web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <BD38DC430E434F79B63832050B44DA53@jimnichols> <BANLkTinCi_aYvnyQwfM+g=DF=yB+4gFX4Q@mail.gmail.com> <73337DCD-F5D6-473E-8D88-47F701682A26@yahoo.com> <BANLkTi=FSkpi_ohAbE0OniE6JSZQ0C_OZw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=+M1BLnkM8Lv96PF2V3uYRUq2dHg@mail.gmail.com> <445631.37765.qm@web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Bob Adler wrote:
> Anyone think of another way?
This is the ongoing problem when attempting to do
essentially "large format" work
with digital backs (and or cameras).
The most elegant solution is to use a view camera
with the proper focal length lens and one of the sliding backs.
(adding enormous weight, size and cost to the deal)
You can essentially then frame, tilt shift and focus the shot;
then slide the back along the "film" plane
to grab the sections.
Every other approach brings varying degrees of PIA.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
In reply to:
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)