Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fwd: Queen Elizabeth in town
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:27:13 -0800
References: <mailman.885.1299808024.1011.lug@leica-users.org> <428216FC-F8C0-492C-9216-6A86CEEA0AE0@netvigator.com> <AANLkTikhPcp9BfyBO5Pn7dz=QP=_LYkH720cotBa_=vj@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinYYe-KwRupM2=Vh34uAipXuU_mhZQ6skPRsxAa@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin-Duy0VHrOWNBD6SeMNocpnTW2jowKyGcz2P91@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=H6vPY8fYMOFp484pJes_FoktwQMHbL4mA-ezK@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikxqSr7mfNdqcT3Xhd7Fp6ZOcsF=uWuYqsajOT9@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=a-Stp0prH1_JkDg4SiFykjMRTmR=nhypYX+CR@mail.gmail.com>
I could be wrong, but I bet it's the 19 then. I thought it looks wider than
the SA, but not as wide as the Heliar 15 and of course looks like hardly any
distortion. I guess it makes sense then.
BTW, what ship is it?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Robert Baron <robertbaron1 at
gmail.com>wrote:
> Amazingly (for me) I just pulled a notebook of contact sheets from 2003 and
> see these were shot in March. I had been in DC and then Philadelphia and
> I'm also surprised to see I was shooting the ship with an R8 and a 35 1.4
> and a 19 2.8. On TriX. So much for my vaunted memory.
>
> --
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]
In reply to:
Message from cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer) ([Leica] Queen Elizabeth in town)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Queen Elizabeth in town)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Queen Elizabeth in town)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Fwd: Queen Elizabeth in town)