Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark comments: "I did walk into my apartment building last night and there was a newspaper on the floor in the mail area and the cover shot was black and white. It was the NY Times. So people are still seeing breaking news in black and white." >From what I understand of the newspaper business, there is no particular merit in B&W other than convenience. Editors choose photos and configure the front page to sell papers. In the UK it is either nude cuties, or a scandal involving the Royal family. In the U.S. it is either a horrendous murder or unexpected sports or political results. Back in the day B&W was the quickest (and only) way to get a picture on the front page while the news was hot. During my brief tenure as a photog for the Boston Globe we would snap a 4x5 photo of a spectacular final quarter goal in a Celtics basketball game, soup it in a dip tank on the way to the office in a taxi, pass the wet negative to the Editor who cut it to size with a scissors, run it down to the engraving room elves who had a halftone plate on the press within 10 minutes. The newsboys were hawking papers showing the winning goal as the fans filed out of the Boston Garden. It took only 30 minutes from taking the picture to getting the paper on the streets. It would have been impossible with the color processes available in the 50s. I don't know much about today's digital technology but printing and distributing a newspaper still takes time. Of course it could be done in an instant on the internet. Larry Z